Skip to content

USE CASE · HIRING AND REMOTE ASSESSMENTS

Know whether the candidate actually completed the assessment

Remote hiring runs on trust that the expected person sat the test, answered the questions and attended the interview. AI assistance, impersonation and substitution have made that trust hard to assume.

ACTOR TRUST RECEIPT

Illustrative
Actor
Human
Personhood
Verified
Identity
Verified privately
Presence
Continuous
Human control
High confidence
AI involvement
Low
Session continuity
High confidence
12:41 UTCact_91fk28...

In short

For hiring, Proof of Actor is designed to establish that the expected candidate personally performed an assessment or interview, remained present and in control for the whole session, and to report how materially AI participated, so employers can apply a clear, disclosed policy.

The question

Did this candidate genuinely perform this assessment, or was the work materially performed by AI or another actor?

Context

Why hiring is the first proving ground

Hiring has an unusually clear question and an unusually clear policy. An employer can state up front whether AI assistance is permitted in an assessment, and the candidate can know that rule before starting. That makes hiring the right place to study genuine human interaction, AI-assisted interaction, session continuity and substitution with consent and context.

Remote assessments and video interviews now face AI tools that answer in real time, proxies who sit the test for someone else, and synthetic video. Employers who respond with blanket suspicion harm honest candidates; employers who ignore it lose the signal their assessments exist to produce.

Proof of Actor is designed to replace suspicion with evidence: a transparent attestation of presence, continuity, control and AI participation that both sides can understand. The horizontal platform remains independent; hiring is a consumer of it, not its definition.

What employers struggle to trust today

  • A different person completing the assessment than the one who applied
  • Real-time AI answering during a test or live interview
  • Hand-offs and remote assistance part-way through a session
  • Synthetic or manipulated video presenting a different face
  • Undisclosed AI use where the policy requires unaided work

What Proof of Actor is designed to establish

Trust layers this context needs

Each context asks for a different slice of the trust stack. These are the layers that matter here.

Identity

The candidate is the person who applied, verified privately.

Presence

That candidate is present throughout, not only at the start.

Actor continuity

No substitution or hand-off during the session.

Human control

The candidate is controlling the answers being given.

AI participation

Graded AI involvement, compared with the stated policy.

Policy

Typical policy

Proof of Actor supplies the evidence. Your organisation sets and discloses the policy.

HUMAN
Proposed APIAssessment policy
// Proposed API - illustrative only
policy.require({
  actor: "human",
  identity: "verified_private",
  presence: "continuous",
  control: 0.90,
  aiAssistance: "low"
});

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How can employers tell if a candidate used AI during an assessment?

Reliable judgement needs evidence about the whole session, not a guess about one answer. Proof of Actor is designed to report presence, continuity, human control and a graded level of AI participation, so an employer can compare what happened with the policy the candidate was given.

What is candidate fraud?

Candidate fraud covers misrepresentation in hiring, including impersonation, proxy test-takers, fabricated identities and synthetic video in interviews. Proof of Actor focuses on the actor question: whether the expected candidate was present and in control of the assessment or interview.

Is all AI use treated as misconduct?

No. Trust is contextual. Some employers allow AI assistance and some roles expect it. Proof of Actor supplies evidence; the employer sets and discloses the policy, and HUMAN + AI is a legitimate outcome where it is permitted.

Will this be another proctoring product?

No. Proof of Actor is horizontal trust infrastructure. Hiring products can consume it, but the platform is designed to be privacy-aware and to return claims with evidence rather than surveillance footage.

What interaction do you struggle to trust?

Design partners help define the evidence that would change their decisions. Tell us about yours.